Pathophysiological Effects of Sulfur Mustard on Skin and its Current Treatments: Possible Application of Phytochemicals.

BACKGROUND: Sulfur-(SM) and nitrogen (NM)-based mustards are the mutagenic incapacitating compounds which are widely used in vesicating the chemical warfare and cause toxicity in many organs, especially skin. SM, as a potent vesicating agent, contributes to the destruction of skin in dermis and epidermis layers. The progression of the lesion depends on the concentration of SM and the duration of exposure. Body responses start with pruritus, erythema, edema and xerosis, which lead to the accumulation of immune cells in the target sites and recruitment of mast cells and paracrine-mediated activity. Pro-inflammatory effectors are accumulated in the epidermis, hair follicles, and sebaceous glands resulting in the destruction of the basement membrane beneath the epidermis. There is still no satisfactory countermeasure against SM-induced lesions in clinical therapy, and the symptomatic or supportive treatments are routine management approaches. OBJECTIVE: The current review highlights the recent progression of herbal medicines application in SM-induced injuries through the illustrative examples and also demonstrates their efficacies, properties and mechanism of actions as therapeutic agents. CONCLUSION: Phytochemicals and herbal extracts with anti-bacterial, anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties have been recently shown to hold therapeutic promise against the SM-induced cutaneous complications. The present review discusses the possible application of herbal medicines in the healing of SM-induced injuries.

Evaluation of waste anesthetic gas surveillance program and isoflurane exposures during animal and human surgery.

Prolonged occupational exposure to waste anesthetic gases may have the potential to cause adverse health effects. Workplace exposure surveillance programs are intended to reduce health risk by evaluating exposures to waste anesthetic gases during surgical procedures. Both the personal breathing-zone and area measurements are used to assess occupational exposure in the operating theater. Direct-reading instruments provide real-time measurements and are useful for identifying leaks and evaluating on-the-spot corrective actions. Passive diffusion monitors quantify occupational exposures over time during surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate a waste anesthetic gas surveillance program to understand occupational exposures and further improve data collection strategy. For this study, 76 survey reports from 2012 through 2014 were retrospectively reviewed to assess occupational exposures to isoflurane in 58 unique procedural rooms operated by the National Institutes of Health. The surveys included industrial hygiene assessments performed during animal and human surgical procedures. The survey reports were evaluated qualitatively and data from these reports was transcribed for quantitative analysis. Variations in sample strategy were observed between surveys and were attributed to ambiguity in the written surveillance program. The study also evaluated the relationship between isoflurane concentrations and sampling method, sampling location, patient type, or scavenging method. Isoflurane exposures were significantly higher among procedures performed on rodents compared to the patients with a large body mass (humans, non-human primates, and swine) (P < 0.05) and in procedures using the charcoal canister exhaust system compared with the central vacuum exhaust system. In addition, individuals performing the surgical procedure experienced elevated occupational exposures measured by both direct-reading instrument and passive diffusion monitors, that is, exposure was significantly higher as measured at the breathing-zone compared with any area within the room (P < 0.05). The study identified several inconsistencies and shortcomings in the surveillance program. Isoflurane concentrations measured during rodent procedures requires further review of work practices and engineering controls. Overall, the findings provide insights to further improve data collection, monitoring, and control of isoflurane exposures.

Spraying urea solution reduces formaldehyde levels during gross anatomy courses.

Formaldehyde (FA) is frequently used to embalm human cadavers that are employed to teach gross anatomy to medical and dental students. However, exposure to FA is harmful to both students and educators. The aim of this study was to reduce the FA levels in the anatomy dissection hall by spraying an FA scavenger solution. We measured the changes in FA levels after administering FA scavenger solutions to liquid, wet paper towels, organs, and cadavers containing FA. Among L-cysteine, N-ethyl urea, and urea, the latter was found to have the strongest scavenging power towards the FA in the liquid. The molar concentration of urea that most efficiently reduced the levels of volatilized FA from the wet paper towels was the same as that of the FA. After spraying the urea solution, the volatilized FA levels immediately decreased, reaching their minimum at 60 min, and remained low even after 240 min. Spraying the urea solution onto the organs reduced the levels of FA volatilized from the surfaces of organs but not those from the insides of the organs. In the dissection hall used for the gross anatomy course at Tokyo Medical University, the FA levels were significantly decreased after spraying the urea solution onto the cadavers. Moreover, dissection could be performed without the cadavers putrefying during the 4-month course. These results indicate that various institutes could use urea solution spray to effectively reduce the FA levels in the dissection hall and thus ensure the safety of students and educators.

Operating Room Fires.

Operating room fires are rare but devastating events. Guidelines are available for the prevention and management of surgical fires; however, these recommendations are based on expert opinion and case series. The three components of an operating room fire are present in virtually all surgical procedures: an oxidizer (oxygen, nitrous oxide), an ignition source (i.e., laser, "Bovie"), and a fuel. This review analyzes each fire ingredient to determine the optimal clinical strategy to reduce the risk of fire. Surgical checklists, team training, and the specific management of an operating room fire are also reviewed.

Delivery of sevoflurane using a neonatal ventilator.

BACKGROUND: Most anesthetic ventilators are designed to cope with a wide range of patient sizes and may lack precision at the lowest end of the minute volume scale. Neonatal intensive care ventilators on the other hand are designed specifically for this patient group, but are not able to deliver volatile anesthesia. AIMS: We aimed to adapt the neonatal ventilator currently in use in our institution to deliver sevoflurane by incorporating a vaporizer and a scavenging system. METHODS: We used a Diamedica draw-over vaporizer incorporated into the ventilator circuit and a custom designed open interface scavenging system. A number of safety measures are described to ensure that this equipment is correctly inserted into the circuit. RESULTS: Bench testing revealed that the vaporizer output is linear and stable within the circuit flow range 4-8 L/min in all modes except high frequency oscillation where concentrations are not predictable. The scavenging system was found to be effective and did not affect volumes, pressures or waveforms when ventilating a test lung over a wide range of flows and pressures. This remained the case over the full range of scavenger flow adjustment. CONCLUSION: The addition of a Diamedica vaporizer to a Fabian neonatal ventilator was shown in bench testing to provide stable, linear vapor concentrations without compromise of ventilator function. The system should not be used in high frequency oscillation mode because concentrations will exceed those expected and will not maintain a linear relationship with the vaporizer setting.

A case report of personal exposures to isoflurane during animal anesthesia procedures.

The purpose of this study was to compare personal exposures to isoflurane from participants' breathing zone samples during animal anesthesia procedures by the method of anesthetic gas delivery and the waste anesthetic gas (WAG) control method utilized. WAG control methods included passive scavenging using charcoal canisters, active scavenging using a building vacuum system, and various local exhaust ventilation systems such as laboratory fume hoods and capture hoods. Methods of anesthesia delivery included induction chambers, face masks (also known as nose cones), and intubation. Personal breathing zone samples were collected using 3M 3520 Organic Vapor Diffusion Monitors and submitted to an International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 17025 accredited laboratory for analysis. When using face masks and induction chambers as the method of anesthesia delivery, local exhaust ventilation systems were found to be the best WAG control method to mitigate personal exposures to isoflurane. Personal exposures to isoflurane were well-controlled when animals were intubated, regardless of whether passive scavenging with an adsorptive charcoal canister or active scavenging with a building vacuum system was used. Personal exposures to isoflurane were highest when induction chambers and face masks were used for anesthesia delivery, and passive scavenging with adsorptive charcoal canisters were used as the control method. This study served to identify best practice WAG control methods for research and veterinary procedures that involve isoflurane anesthesia.

Evaluation of a novel waste anaesthetic gas scavenger device for use during recovery from anaesthesia.

Volatile anaesthetic agents are a potential occupational health hazard to theatre and recovery staff. Operating theatres and anaesthetic rooms are required to be equipped with scavenging systems, but recovery units often are not. We compared exhaled, spectrophotometric sevoflurane and desflurane concentrations 15 cm from the mouth ('patient breathing zone') and 91 cm laterally to the patient ('nurse work zone') in 120 patients after tracheal extubation who were consecutively allocated to either ISO-Gard mask oxygen/scavenging or standard oxygen mask, 0 min, 10 min and 20 min after arrival in the theatre recovery unit. Median (IQR [range]) duration of anaesthesia was similar between groups (control 76 (44-119 [15-484]) min vs. study group 90 (64-130 [15-390]) min, p = 0.136). Using the ISO-Gard mask, the 20-min mean patient breathing zone and nurse work zone exhaled anaesthetic levels were ~ 90% and 78% lower than those recorded in the control group, respectively, and were within the recommended 2 ppm maximum environmental exposure limit in the patient breathing zone of 53 out of 60 (88%) and the nurse work zone of all 60 (100%) patients on first measurement in the recovery room (vs. 10 out of 60 (17%) and 40 out of 60 (67%) in the control group). Our study indicates that the ISO-Gard oxygen/scavenging mask reduces the level of exhaled sevoflurane and desflurane below recommended maximum exposure limits near > 85% of extubated patients within ~ 20 s of application in the recovery unit after surgery. We encourage the use of this mask to minimise the occupational exposure of recovery staff to exhaled volatile agents.

An innovative technique to improve safety of volatile anesthetics suction from the cardiopulmonary bypass circuit.

CONTEXT: Myocardial injury during cardiac surgery on cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) is a major determinant of morbidity and mortality. Preclinical and clinical evidence of dose- and time-related cardioprotective effects of volatile anesthetic drugs exist and their use during the whole surgery duration could improve perioperative cardiac protection. Even if administering volatile agents during CPB are relatively easy, technical problems, such as waste gas scavenging, may prevent safe and manageable administration of halogenated vapors during CPB. AIMS: The aim of this study is to improve the safe administration of volatile anesthesia during CPB. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: Tertiary teaching hospital. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We describe an original device that collects and disposes of any volatile anesthetic vapors present in the exit stream of the oxygenator, hence preventing its dispersal into the operating theatre environment and adaptively regulates pressure of oxygenator chamber in the CPB circuit. RESULTS: We have so far applied a prototype of this device in more than 1300 adult cardiac surgery patients who received volatile anesthetics during the CPB phase. CONCLUSIONS: Widespread implementation of scavenging system like the one we designed may facilitate the perfusionist and the anesthesiologist in delivering these cardioprotective drugs with beneficial impact on patients' outcome without compromising on safety.

Comparison of waste anesthetic gases in operating rooms with or without an scavenging system in a Brazilian University Hospital / Comparação de resíduos de gases anestésicos em salas de operação com ou sem sistema de exaustão em hospital universitário brasileiro

Abstract Background and objectives Occupational exposure to waste anesthetic gases in operating room without active scavenging system has been associated with adverse health effects. Thus, this study aimed to compare the trace concentrations of the inhalational anesthetics isoflurane and sevoflurane in operating room with and without central scavenging system. Method Waste concentrations of isoflurane and sevoflurane were measured by infrared analyzer at different locations (near the respiratory area of the assistant nurse and anesthesiologist and near the anesthesia station) and at two times (30 and 120 min after the start of surgery) in both operating room types. Results All isoflurane and sevoflurane concentrations in unscavenged operating room were higher than the US recommended limit (2 parts per million), regardless of the location and time evaluated. In scavenged operating room, the average concentrations of isoflurane were within the limit of exposure, except for the measurements near the anesthesia station, regardless of the measurement times. For sevoflurane, concentrations exceeded the limit value at all measurement locations and at both times. Conclusions The exposure to both anesthetics exceeded the international limit in unscavenged operating room. In scavenged operating room, the concentrations of sevoflurane, and to a lesser extent those of isoflurane, exceeded the recommended limit value. Thus, the operating room scavenging system analyzed in the present study decreased the anesthetic concentrations, although not to the internationally recommended values.

Resumo Justificativa e objetivos A exposição ocupacional aos resíduos de gases anestésicos em salas de operação (SO) sem sistema ativo de exaustão tem sido associada a efeitos adversos à saúde. Assim, o objetivo do estudo foi comparar os resíduos dos anestésicos inalatórios isoflurano e sevoflurano em SO com e sem sistema de exaustão. Método Concentrações residuais de isoflurano e sevoflurano foram mensuradas por analisador infravermelho em diferentes locais (próximo à área respiratória do auxiliar de enfermagem e do anestesiologista e próximo à estação de anestesia) e em dois momentos (30 e 120 min após o início da cirurgia) em ambos os tipos de SO. Resultados Todas as concentrações de isoflurano e sevoflurano nas SO sem sistema de exaustão foram mais elevadas em relação ao valor limite recomendado pelos EUA (2 partes por milhão), independentemente do local e momento avaliados. Nas SO com sistema de exaustão, as concentrações médias de isoflurano ficaram dentro do limite de exposição, exceto para as mensurações próximas à estação de anestesia, independentemente dos momentos avaliados. Para o sevoflurano, as concentrações excederam o valor limite em todos locais de medição e nos dois momentos. Conclusões A exposição a ambos os anestésicos excedeu o limite internacional nas SO sem sistema de exaustão. Nas SO com sistema de exaustão, as concentrações de sevoflurano, e em menor extensão, as de isoflurano excederam o valor limite recomendado. Dessa forma, o sistema de exaustão das SO analisado no presente estudo diminuiu as concentrações dos anestésicos, embora não tenha reduzido a valores internacionalmente recomendados.

[Comparison of waste anesthetic gases in operating rooms with or without an scavenging system in a Brazilian University Hospital]. / Comparação de resíduos de gases anestésicos em salas de operação com ou sem sistema de exaustão em hospital universitário brasileiro.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Occupational exposure to waste anesthetic gases in operating room (OR) without active scavenging system has been associated with adverse health effects. Thus, this study aimed to compare the trace concentrations of the inhaled anesthetics isoflurane and sevoflurane in OR with and without central scavenging system. METHOD: Waste concentrations of isoflurane and sevoflurane were measured by infrared analyzer at different locations (near the respiratory area of the assistant nurse and anesthesiologist and near the anesthesia station) and at two times (30 and 120minutes after the start of surgery) in both OR types. RESULTS: All isoflurane and sevoflurane concentrations in unscavenged OR were higher than the US recommended limit (2 parts per million), regardless of the location and time evaluated. In scavenged OR, the average concentrations of isoflurane were within the limit of exposure, except for the measurements near the anesthesia station, regardless of the measurement times. For sevoflurane, concentrations exceeded the limit value at all measurement locations and at both times. CONCLUSIONS: The exposure to both anesthetics exceeded the international limit in unscavenged OR. In scavenged OR, the concentrations of sevoflurane, and to a lesser extent those of isoflurane, exceeded the recommended limit value. Thus, the OR scavenging system analyzed in the present study decreased the anesthetic concentrations, although not to the internationally recommended values.

Occupational exposure to nitrous oxide during procedural pain control in children: a comparison of different inhalation techniques and scavenging systems.

BACKGROUND: Nitrous oxide (N2 O 50% in oxygen) is commonly used for painful procedures in children. Potential negative health effects associated with chronic workplace exposure limit its use. Safe occupational N2 O exposure concentrations are below 25 ppm environmental concentration as a time-weighted average (TWA) and below 200 ppm as a short-time exposure level (STEL) of 15 min. AIM: The aim was to assess occupational exposure of staff during nitrous oxide administration to children using different inhalation delivery devices and scavenging systems. METHODS: Staff nitrous oxide exposure during use of a double face mask (DFM) with or without a demand valve (DV) was compared with a conventional single face mask (FM). We also compared exposure using the hospital central scavenging system with a portable evacuation system. N2 O concentrations, representing exposure values, were monitored within proximity to staff. Urine N2 O concentration was measured in staff administering the N2 O at the end of the procedural session. RESULTS: The mean and median values of TWA and STEL within the working area were lower than recommended values in the DFM (10.8, 11.6 ppm for TWA; 13.9, 11.0 ppm for STEL) and DFM-DV groups (2.3, 2.8 ppm for TWA; 4.4, 3.5 ppm for STEL) using the portable evacuation system. The N2 O urine exposure in DFM-DV group was lower than DFM group: a mean difference of 9.56 ppm (95% CI 2.65-16.46). Staff N2 O urinary concentrations were within safe biological limits in both the DFM and DFM-DV groups. High exposure concentrations to N2 O were recorded in all FM and FM-DV environmental and biological samples. CONCLUSIONS: The DFM system, with or without a DV, connected to a portable evacuation system during N2 O administration to children for painful procedures kept N2 O levels within the local environment below recommended limits.

Survey of American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry on Nitrous Oxide and Sedation: 20 Years Later.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to survey the membership of the American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry (AAPD) and determine the current status of nitrous oxide (N2O) utilization in their dental practices while also comparing the findings to a similar survey completed 20 years ago. METHODS: A 55-item questionnaire on the use of N2O was sent to the AAPD membership. RESULTS: The total number of respondents was 1,632 (26 percent). Sixty-two percent are board-certified, 97 percent use N2O in their office, 18 percent indicated greater than 80 percent of their patient pool required N2O versus six percent in 1996. Fifty percent of parents expressed concerns about N2O use. CONCLUSIONS: Changes have occurred in the use of nitrous oxide since 1996, including: (1) a greater percentage of practitioners using N2O; (2) perceptions that more pediatric patients need N2O; (3) a shift in use of N2O by duration of practitioner experience; (4) an increased percentage of board-certified respondents; and (5) possible increasing parental concerns about N2O.

The five-minute prebreathe in evaluating carbon dioxide absorption in a closed-circuit rebreather: a randomized single-blind study.

INTRODUCTION: Closed-circuit underwater rebreather apparatus (CCR) recycles expired gas through a carbon dioxide (CO2) 'scrubber'. Prior to diving, users perform a five-minute 'prebreathe' during which they self-check for symptoms of hypercapnia that might indicate a failure in the scrubber. There is doubt that this strategy is valid. METHODS: Thirty divers were block-randomized to breathe for five minutes on a circuit in two of the following three conditions: normal scrubber, partly-failed scrubber, and absent scrubber. Subjects were blind to trial allocation and instructed to terminate the prebreathe on suspicion of hypercapnia. RESULTS: Early termination was seen in 0/20, 2/20, and 15/20 of the normal, partly-failed, and absent absorber conditions, respectively. Subjects in the absent group experienced a steady, uncontrolled rise in inspired (PICO2) and end-tidal CO2 (PETCO2). Seven subjects exhibited little or no increase in minute volume yet reported dyspnoea at termination, suggesting a biochemically-mediated stimulus to terminate. This was consistent with results in the partly-failed condition (which resulted in a plateaued mean PICO2 near 20 mmHg), where a small increase in ventilation typically compensated for the inspired CO2 increase. Consequently, mean PETCO2 did not change and in the absence of a hypercapnic biochemical stimulus, subjects were very insensitive to this condition. CONCLUSIONS: While prebreathes are useful to evaluate other primary functions, the five-minute prebreathe is insensitive for CO2 scrubber faults in a rebreather. Partly-failed conditions are dangerous because most will not be detected at the surface, even though they may become very important at depth.

Health worker exposure risk during inhalation sedation with sevoflurane using the (AnaConDa®) anaesthetic conserving device.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Occupational exposure to sevoflurane should not exceed 2 ppm. During inhalation sedation with sevoflurane using the anaesthetic conserving device (AnaConDa(®)) in the post-anaesthesia care unit, waste gases can be reduced by gas extraction systems or scavenging devices such as CONTRAfluran™. However, the efficacy of these methods has not been clearly established. To determine the safest scenario for healthcare workers during inhalation sedation with sevoflurane in the post-surgical intensive care unit. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An experimental study on occupational exposure was conducted in a post-cardiothoracic care unit during March-August 2009. The measurements were performed in four post-cardiac surgery sedated adults in post-surgical intensive care unit and four nurses at the bedside, and at four points: scenario A, inhalation sedation without gas extraction system or contrafluran as a reference scenario; scenario B, applying a gas extraction system to the ventilator; scenario C, using contrafluran; and scenario 0, performing intravenous isolation sedation. Sevoflurane concentrations were measured in the nurses' breathing area during patient care, and at 1.5 and 8 m from the ventilator using diffusive passive monitor badges. RESULTS: All badges corresponding to the nurses' breathing area were below 2 ppm. Levels of sevoflurane detected using prevention systems were lower than that in the control situation. Only one determination over 2 ppm was found, corresponding to the monitor placed nearest the gas outlet of the ventilator in scenario A. Trace concentrations of sevoflurane were found in scenario 0 during intravenous sedation. CONCLUSIONS: Administration of sevoflurane through the AnaConDa(®) system during inhalation sedation in post-surgical intensive care units is safe for healthcare workers, but gas extraction systems or scavenging systems, such as CONTRAfluran™ should be used to reduce occupational exposure as much as possible.